MODEL COMPARISON // HONEST ASSESSMENT
Every IT service model solves a different problem. Here's how they compare.
We don't pretend Allari is right for everyone. Strategy firms, offshore providers, and third-party support each have a role. The question is which model fits your operational reality — and what the true cost of each looks like when you account for capacity, knowledge retention, and execution velocity.
Or view field reports →Self-funded since 1999. No private equity. No investor obligations.
The Strategy Firms
Accenture • Deloitte
They sell roadmaps. We sell traction. Strategy firms bill by the hour, incentivizing long projects over outcomes.
The Body Shops
TCS • Cognizant • Wipro • Infosys
The Contractor Paradox: renting bodies destroys context. Knowledge drops 50% at every handoff.
The Maintenance Firms
Spinnaker Support • Rimini Street
They freeze your legacy to save money. We stabilize your legacy to recover capacity for transformation.
They Sell Hours.
We Sell Velocity.
The billable-hour model creates a fundamental misalignment: vendors profit when problems persist. Execution Engineering flips the incentive—we profit when you move faster.
Traditional: Pay for presence, not progress
Allari: Pay for velocity (15-min increments)
THE PROOF POINT
16.42 → 1.77
Days Ticket Aging (HellermannTyton)
30-40%
Execution Capacity Recovered
19%
Year 1 Cost Reduction
Stop Comparing. Start Calculating.
Quantify exactly how much capacity your current model is destroying.
Calculate Your Execution Drag